Legalpath
Driving Activation and Retention for a B2B Legal Workflow Platform
Driving Activation and Retention for a B2B Legal Workflow Platform


Role:
Product Designer
Team size:
5 people
Timeline:
6 months
Core tools:
Figma, Amplitude, Hotjar, Linear
Overview
The problem
Legalpath had strong retention among power users but was losing new customers fast — 61% dropped off before completing a single meaningful action in their first two weeks.
The solution
A goal-based onboarding flow that surfaced value in under 3 minutes. Navigation restructured around jobs-to-be-done. A contextual help system replaced static docs that nobody read.
Key outcomes
38%
Less time on documentation per shift at Medflow
62%
Fewer IT support tickets in the 3 months post-launch
4.6/5
Staff satisfaction score after rollout
38%
Less time on documentation per shift at Medflow
62%
Fewer IT support tickets in the 3 months post-launch
4.6/5
Staff satisfaction score after rollout
Research & discovery
Understanding the problem space
We analysed 6 months of Amplitude event data and ran moderated sessions with 18 new users across three customer segments. The core finding: users didn’t understand what the product was for until they’d already given up. Onboarding assumed too much prior knowledge and offered no progressive guidance.
We analysed 6 months of Amplitude event data and ran moderated sessions with 18 new users across three customer segments. The core finding: users didn’t understand what the product was for until they’d already given up. Onboarding assumed too much prior knowledge and offered no progressive guidance.


User interviews
We analysed 6 months of Amplitude event data and ran moderated sessions with 18 new users across three customer segments. The core finding: users didn’t understand what the product was for until they’d already given up. Onboarding assumed too much prior knowledge and offered no progressive guidance.


We analysed 6 months of Amplitude event data and ran moderated sessions with 18 new users across three customer segments. The core finding: users didn’t understand what the product was for until they’d already given up. Onboarding assumed too much prior knowledge and offered no progressive guidance.
Key findings
Search paralysis
Users spent an average of 15 minutes just locating the correct compliance templates because the search architecture relied on exact-match file names.
No bulk processing
Legal teams had to approve documents one by one. The inability to select and approve in bulk added hours of repetitive clicking to their weekly workload.
Navigation fatigue
Core workflow features were buried four clicks deep. Moving the most utilized tools to a persistent sidebar was explicitly requested by every single interviewed user.
Search paralysis
Users spent an average of 15 minutes just locating the correct compliance templates because the search architecture relied on exact-match file names.
No bulk processing
Legal teams had to approve documents one by one. The inability to select and approve in bulk added hours of repetitive clicking to their weekly workload.
Navigation fatigue
Core workflow features were buried four clicks deep. Moving the most utilized tools to a persistent sidebar was explicitly requested by every single interviewed user.
Design process
Creating lofi designs
We sketched 12 concepts across three directions — unified timeline, role-based dashboards, and a structured handover form. Role-based dashboards tested strongest in paper prototype sessions.


Design solutions






Impact
Key outcomes
61%
Reduction in drop-off between sign-up and first meaningful action
48%
Increase in users reaching their first key action within 7 days
35%
Growth in daily active users over 90 days post-launch
38%
Less time on documentation per shift at Medflow
62%
Fewer IT support tickets in the 3 months post-launch
4.6/5
Staff satisfaction score after rollout